Are we a catagenesis or an anagenesis?

Nietzsche thought that man is definitely the most botched and bungled of all of the animal species, a clear catagenesis or involution, and that our social evolution is clearly continual decadence.

Most others believe that man is the pinnacle of evolutionary development, the paragon of animals, a clear anagenesis, and our social evolution is a clear if not continual progress. Who is right? Is this a pseudo-problem?

What would namians and zetosophers say?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s